US Diplomatic Outreach to Iran Sparks Political Friction in Tehran
A letter from US Vice President JD Vance to Iranian security officials has fueled intense speculation in Tehran over the political standing of Parliamentary Speaker Mohammad-Baqer Qalibaf amid factional debates.

A letter from US Vice President JD Vance to Iran's Supreme National Security Council has sparked intense speculation and political friction in Tehran, with hardline factions alleging that Parliamentary Speaker Mohammad-Baqer Qalibaf has been marginalized from nuclear negotiations.
Speculation Over US Outreach
The controversy began when US Vice President JD Vance transmitted a direct message to Mohsen Rezaei regarding potential renewed diplomatic engagement. The US administration's decision to bypass Qalibaf—who formally heads Iran's negotiating team—and instead address Rezaei prompted conservative media outlets to argue that Rezaei had effectively assumed control of foreign policy talks. Speculation further intensified following a high-level meeting in Tehran involving regional defense officials, which Qalibaf notably did not attend.
Despite the rumors, senior Iranian officials have firmly rejected claims of a leadership shakeup. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi reiterated in a recent interview that Tehran continues to view Qalibaf as the official chief negotiator, noting that Rezaei fully supports this arrangement. Araghchi also characterized the American diplomatic overture as a positive step, while warning that any US attempt to exploit the contacts to sow internal division would backfire.
Hardline Attacks and Moderate Pushback
Hardline media outlets, closely aligned with the Paydari Front, launched severe attacks against Qalibaf, accusing him of unauthorized diplomatic maneuvers and unauthorized ceasefire agreements. Outlets such as Raja News argued that foreign policy authority has decisively shifted toward Rezaei, who is widely viewed as representing the ascendant hardline faction following the tenure of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and leadership adjustments under Mojtaba Khamenei.
Conversely, moderate and centrist Iranian commentators dismissed the reports of factional infighting as politically motivated fabrication. Publications such as Asr-e Iran emphasized that Qalibaf and Rezaei remain coordinated, asserting that foreign powers cannot dictate Tehran's internal decision-making structures or manufacture artificial rifts among senior state officials.



