From Global Giant to Retail Vacuum: The Crisis Facing Nike

Nike faces a severe financial and cultural slump, with its market cap dropping by over $200 billion. Amid rising competition from brands like On Cloud and Adidas, new CEO Elliott Hill aims to restore the sportswear giant's roots.

Israel HayomAuthor: Ilan Kaprov
Source
From Global Giant to Retail Vacuum: The Crisis Facing Nike
Photo: Israel Hayom / נייקי | צילום: רויטרס

Until a few years ago, the shopping experience in sporting goods stores was almost always tied to the story of a single colossal brand. Even if you did not intend to purchase a Nike product, you could not ignore its presence: the famous V, top-tier global athletes as brand ambassadors, and catchy slogans. In many stores, it earned a dedicated section, distinct from competitors due to a mythology built over four decades.

Today, Nike remains the world's largest sports brand, but its famed prominence no longer translates into dominance. Influencers and experts have repeatedly chosen competing brands as superior in recent years. Visually, shoes from competitors such as On Cloud or Hoka command far more attention than the nostalgic designs of the American sportswear giant.

"They have to get back to their roots," NBA star LeBron James said in an interview with Yahoo Sports. According to him, the company must reconnect with communities and younger consumers who helped the company grow into a super-brand status. "When I was young, there were people who talked to youths, asked them what they liked and didn't like—that doesn't happen anymore."

The Financial Slump and Market Cap Plunge

The sense of change in stores is reinforced by the company's financial results. Nike stock experienced a 78% plunge from its peak recorded in November 2021. The company's market capitalization was wiped out by approximately $220-230 billion. The low led to the removal of the stock from the S&P 100 index after nearly 18 consecutive years.

This decline did not happen due to an unexpected event. The strategy chosen by the company under former CEO John Donahoe is what led it to lose its retail, cultural, and commercial relevance.

The historical connection with Michael Jordan birthed the world's most recognizable shoe (Air Jordan) and allowed Nike to envelop it in a cultural phenomenon. Buying shoes transformed from a functional act into a statement of style and belonging. Over the past year, the company recorded revenues of $46.4 billion (yet only $3.1 billion in net profit).

The Vacuum Created on Shelves

Following the COVID-19 lockdowns, Nike invested massive resources into online shopping platforms. However, while in-app purchasing is convenient, Nike created a vacuum in physical stores—into which competitors stepped.

Once the most dominant brand in stores, it lost its place to new, creative companies as well as established ones that managed to execute a timely pivot. New Balance, Adidas, and Asics developed new viral models, compared to Nike, which continued to market new versions of the same historical trademarks.

The company also managed to lose the technological edge it held for years, as competitors like On Cloud and Hoka identified the need for comfort alongside style, with models that successfully prevent fatigue and pain even after long hours of use, appealing to much broader market segments than individuals who train on a daily basis.

Adidas Climbs, China Slips Away

Nike's global market share dropped from 15.2% to 14%, while Adidas climbed to 8.9%, and New Balance reported global growth of 19%. Additionally, sales share in China plummeted by 11% as the company lost its attractiveness to local brands.

This problem does not stop in the US or Europe. Sales share in China plummeted by 11% ($5.85 billion) over the past year, as Nike lost its attractiveness to local brands like Anta and Li-Ning, which understand the local target audience much better, have a much greater prominence in stores, master the jargon and culture, and provide dedicated products—while Nike treats the entire world as a single monolith.

In an attempt to stop the collapse, Nike brought Elliott Hill back to the CEO chair. His first step was to return the company to prominence in major sporting goods stores and refocus on sports innovation.

Comeback, Decline, or Split

After all the mistakes, Nike still enjoys immense global recognition and a massive roster of elite athletes. The turnaround could end in one of three possibilities: a major commercial, cultural, and social comeback; a slow and continuous decline; or a split separating the fashion arm from the sports arm.

"We cannot continue to sit and tell ourselves that everything is great," CEO Elliott Hill said in an internal meeting, admitting that the company lost its obsession with sports: "We are a brand built on winning, but wins must be earned."

Related News